America’s Midnight Hour

This post is not having anything to do with the Operation American Spring directly, but rather an “idea” that some of the “sprung Springs” (unhinged membership) of OAS are repeatedly promoting.   What is offered here is not just opinion, but rather is grounded in inescapable fact.

In such discussions as  The Posse’s “Universe Shattering Evidence”,  comment is made in support of Sheriff Arpaio’s “posse” investigation of Obama’s digital release of his  birth certificate, an entirely irrelevant and false “affidavit”, and a frenzy over the much  anticipated release of new “bombshell” evidence. .

First,  I recognize that Obama is undeniably, by known facts, unable to hold the Office of President; he’s absolutely not an Article II natural born citizen.  See “Natural Born Defined” (PDF).   That’s not the issue here.

However Arpaio’s investigation of the layered digital document served no purpose, and did not establish fraud, nor forgery.

The fact is that the Hawaiian Dept of Health (HDOH) is entitled BY LAW, under Hawaiian Revised Statute (See HRS §338-13 below), to produce birth information in whatever form it deems necessary, which is reasonable.  Can you imagine if a Dept of Health were not able to produce vital birth information  in whatever form as necessary, and provide it to, say, court hearings, judges, or other authorities whose business is to consider such issues?

HDOH might literally put the birth information on a cocktail napkin, and along with appropriate certifications, it would be valid.  The released Obama digital birth document is rather obviously the result of a digital compilation of at least 3 separate documents: 1) a photocopy of the bound ledger information,  2) the certification page, and 3) the digitized security background, which can be seen to not conform to the curved ledger book page, making claims that it is  “tampered with” considerably oblivious.  Of course it’s been “tampered with” – it’s a digital compilation! Beyond that, the document could be loaded with all sorts of conflicting font types, and hidden smiley faces, and none of this would undermine the fact that it is (still) a legally valid, legitimate document.

Not Forgery

Furthermore that Obama document did not attempt to mimic any sort of official document form, but was a distinct document unto itself, therefore incapable of being “forgery” of some other document form.  If one sets out forge something, it would be something with its own distinct form, like a Picasso, or a $100 bill.  Being a compilation of other documents,   the Obama digital birth document is obviously not any sort of pre-established  format, and thus cannot be a “forgery” of anything! Those who imagine that a birth certificate must have things such as doctor signature,  parent’s signatures and addresses, and even an inked baby footprint, really are not aware of what such documents are. Such documents are not final birth certificates at all, and rather only the hospital’s application for a birth certificate – notifications of birth.

Not Fraud

And to be “fraud”, the  birth terms indicated in that document must themselves be shown to be false, and deliberately false, but Arpaio’s investigation did not even attempt to establish this.   The “posse” affidavit  offers no statements to undermine the birth data on  Obama’s birth documentation, so the Posse’s claim that it proved fraud is just utterly irresponsible nonsense.

On a larger scale, what bothers me about this still ongoing Arpaio investigation is that, even at this late date, it continues to focus attention on the “birth document”, as if being a citizen, or “born citizen”, were sufficient to meet the Article II requirement of natural born citizen, when it is not.   This focus on the “birth certificate” is entirely distorting the terms of natural born citizen, and corrupting the issue in the public eye.

In fact this whole investigation is doing exactly what Obama himself wants, even as demonstrated on his early FightTheSmears page, because it continues to reduce the issue before the public and media to involving mere “citizenship” status, rather than the actual terms of natural born citizen  — “birth on U.S. soil to parents who were citizens”, even as recognized repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Harry Riley has consistently made supporting statements of Arpaio on programs such as the “Birther Report”, which makes my discussion of this issue appropriate here.   (In the interest of full disclosure, I should point out that Birther Report recognized my own writing on Natural Born Defined.)  The sort of “inexact thought” evidenced in the Arpaio investigation seems to proliferate throughout the OAS movement, and is particularly evident in Riley’s 3-phase plan, and glaring absence of demands justified in terms of the Constitution.  Normally such sloppy thinking is not a problem, but when our nation’s future is at stake, and lives are on the the line, with the distinct  possibility of indefinite incarceration in federal prison,  then this sort of “rank” stupidity cannot be indulged.

With such vital issues at stake involving this country’s very existence, it’s time to stop with the “stupid people tricks”.  This ain’t Ringling Bros, and Harry Riley is no Ring Master.  If Riley is even any sort of “C.O.” (Commanding Officer), as they love to refer to him, then one has to question  what exactly he is demonstrating command of.

Seriously, wake up, my fellow Americans.  Dear God, wake up now; it’s America’s Midnight Hour!

Footnote: U.S.N. Commander (Ret.) Charles Kerchner also cited my article “Natural Born Defined” on his personal blog.  . Kerchner sued Obama in 2010 in Kerchner vs Obama, represented by Mario Apuzzo. wethepeople-s[1] Hawaiian Revised Statute (HRS):

     §338-13  Certified copies.  (a)  Subject to the requirements of sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18, the department of health shall, upon request, furnish to any applicant a certified copy of any certificate, or the contents of any certificate, or any part thereof.

     (b)  Copies of the contents of any certificate on file in the department, certified by the department shall be considered for all purposes the same as the original, subject to the requirements of sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18.

     (c)  Copies may be made by photography, dry copy reproduction, typing, computer printout or other process approved by the director of health. [L 1949, c 327, §17; RL 1955, §57-16; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-13; am L 1978, c 49, §1]


4 responses

  1. Chris Blystone lied about his Military duties check it out at

  2. There are more issues involved here than compilation problems… According to direct testimony of the records clerk of record… the one signing the documents … the registration numbers were incorrect and there are also problems with the available ‘fonts’ for typewriters of the day… they don’t match. Other irregularities only corroborate document as a the fraud.

    Added to these physical errors is the long history of obfuscation … Obama and the State of Hawaii’s stonewalling and outright refusal to produce the original document. The result is that the original document can no longer be found and may have been destroyed. Highly unusual since it was obvious to everyone that it certainly needed to be preserved… if nothing else than a HISTORICAL record of true archival value.

    If the forged registration of birth were the only problem the case for fraud may not be so powerful… but we also have evidence of a forged ‘Selective Service Card’ and questions regarding the social security number(s) he is using. The sealing of his academic records are unprecedented and may be hiding his registration as a foreign student and aid he is alleged to have received as a foreign student.

    In any event there is sufficient evidence being offered by reputable law enforcement agents that indicate probable cause for a criminal trail to determine the facts and the truth. However, if that were to happen it would open DISCOVERY powers and all the sealed records Obama has kept in the dark may well expose the largest fraud ever perpetrated upon the American people.

    The resulting collapse of this giant House of Cards.. .could lead to multiple felony charges against hundreds if not thousands of individuals in prominent positions of power. Hence, the stonewalling and outright denial of justice thru the derailing of the standard application of due process in this matter.

    1. Colonel, welcome aboard.

      1) The lack of correspondence of the registration numbers, recognized by the Nordyke twins, is irrelevant and might result from any sort of delay by the doctor not being available to sign the documentation, or any one of a number of things. There is no “correct” numbering of the registration numbers.

      2) Similarly there is no valid evidence of the type fonts used being unavailable at the time. THere are a lot of people claming to be experts, but who actually have serious problems in that regard when held up to scrutiny.

      The fact is that examination of this details of this documentation is not going to provide proof of Obama’s lacking legitimacy, but it does entirely distract from proof of his known failed qualification for the Presidency due to having a father who was not at time of birth a citizen of the United States.

      Thus far, none of the evidence offered by Arpaio, or any “reputable law enforcement agents”, has shown any sort of compelling valid evidence whatsoever, much less anything close to establishing “probable cause”. Nothing will ever even enter a valid courtroom with jurisdiction (i.e. the Supreme Court) unless there is some sort of entirely new volume of evidence heretofore unprovided.

      And here’s the sad part: EVEN IF that evidence were to exist, the Supreme Court would not, and could not consider the case. Why? Because the Supreme Court cannot provide any remedy for the problem, there is no “justiciability” by the Court due to it being a “political question”, given the fact that the Court has no authority to remove a sitting President from Office under the Constitution. It’s a “political question” where the court has no justiciability, because that authority resides only with Congress, as indicated by the Constitution. THAT is the reality.

      The layperson, unfamiliar with the reference “political question”, thinks it’s just a cop-out by the courts refusing to do their constitutional duty, or corruption, as in “they’re just playing politics with the issue”.

      Wikipedia indicates the terms of “political question” to be:

      “a textually demonstrable constitutional commitment of the issue to a coordinate political department” (meaning that the U.S. Constitution requires another branch of government to resolve questions regarding the issue);

      1. “a lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards for resolving it”;
      2. an “impossibility of deciding [a matter] without an initial policy determination of a kind clearly for nonjudicial discretion”;
      3. an “impossibility of a court’s undertaking independent resolution without expressing lack of the respect due coordinate branches of government”;
      4. “an unusual need for unquestioning adherence to a political decision already made”; or
      a “potentiality of embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question.”.[7]

      Rather than just being the Court shirking its duty in regard to the Constitution and a sitting unqualified Oval Occupant, the consideration of “political question” in this instance has more to do with the doctrine of Separation of Powers, as indicated above in #1 and #4.

      The Court’s view is that only the Congress has authority under the Constitution to judge whether or not a candidate (or Office Occupant) is qualified under the Constitution. Congress should have considered the qualification for office at the time of counting the electoral votes, if not before. At least in theory, the Court evidently recognizes that Congress still might act at some time in regard to judging that qualification, or in the absence of any conclusion by Congress of being unqualified, it has implicitly recognized the Oval Occupant to be qualified.

      Ultimately, the reality is that it’s a “political question’ because Congress has the authority to act, and has not done so. The Court cannot, and will not, take any court case regarding Obama’s qualification for office, since the Court itself cannot provide any remedy. This is a major blind-spot in the Constitution, and one that could not be fixed unless we give the Supreme Court the authority to remove a sitting President, which may not be a very good idea, particularly given the current Court’s flagrant involvement in political agendas, willing to violate its own authority to promote these (such as gay marriage).

  3. I thought you might enjoy Mr. David Kriesel’s video report regarding character substitution that can happen with the PDF conversion process. This comes from pattern matching technology used in the PDF creation process. Mr. Kriesel is a computer scientist working in Berlin, Germany and is the person who identified this issue to Xerox in 2013. The issue has been in the field since 2006.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: